We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors We love our sponsors
Design Assembly

New New BNZ Logo

by Shaun Lee

bnz final final

I wonder if the file is called logo_cmyk_final_final :D I guess they realised they had gone too far, and that they should not have tied a logo to a campaign.



POSTED – October 2008
BNZ Logo

Check out the new BNZ logo. Another friendly addition to our local Brandscape, but how does it fit in the current economic climate? Is this friendly face really how we want see our Banks? Rumor has it that DNA did it but let me know if I am wrong.


  1. Louise Says:
    October 1st, 2008 at 10:31 am

    my first thoughts – youthful, friendly, with feminine curves – a white cloud on a blue clear sky… but not sure if I trust it?

  2. admin Says:
    October 1st, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Oh it is supposed to be a Pig tail!

    http://www.bnz.co.nz/About_Us/1,1184,3-156-503.html?tid=PHPPBFNewBrand

    It is the second thing paragraph! “Pig Tales led the way”

  3. Elliot Says:
    October 1st, 2008 at 11:17 am

    I always viewed bnz as a conservative bank. Maybe they have chilled out a bit. The new logo seems casual and laid back. I don’t think its better or worse than before. Its just had pinch of web 2.0 e.g. gradient and round corners etc next it will be reflection logo.

  4. kate Says:
    October 1st, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    mmm… don’t mind it. certainly looks better in-situe on the website than the logo on its own as above. It certainly repositions it as an accessible, modern, friendly bank.

  5. casey Says:
    October 3rd, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    I would absolutely love it if it was for a juice company. It is all squidgy, round and I kind of want to squeeze it.

    I left BNZ earlier this year. I did not want to squeeze them once.

  6. admin Says:
    October 3rd, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    That’s funny! The Herald described it as looking like it was written in “toothpaste” :-)

  7. Rebekah Says:
    October 10th, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    It’s very ‘now’ – but will it still hold up a year from now or 5 years…i think its gonna date super quickly. It is very friendly, loose and layed back but thats not what i want from a bank! I am layed back with my cash i don’t want them to be! It’s not bad design its just not right for a bank and I don’t know about anyone else but i am pretty over the web 2.0-ness – yawn! Also reminds me of milk…

  8. casey Says:
    October 22nd, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    http://www.behance.net/Gallery/Serrano/132132

    Kris Sowersby’s custom typeface designed for the bank.

  9. athy Says:
    October 22nd, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    I reckon its dated already. To me its just not right for such a well established bank… I would’ve never thought of anything related to banking if u didn’t say so… But in terms of the font design, thumbs up!

  10. Monica Says:
    October 23rd, 2008 at 7:56 am

    Instant reaction: milky, Ami’s friendliness and ANZ’s logo is more like a bank logo.

  11. FMan Says:
    November 10th, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    The logo looks to0 playful for a banking business. It fits the character of the piggies but not the entire establishment. It looks good but I just feel somehow it is inappropriate.

  12. Danielle Says:
    November 12th, 2008 at 1:30 am

    If I didn’t know better I’d think this was for a budget airline…

  13. Warren Says:
    November 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

    It’s fresh but it’s not appropriate to the market.

  14. chris Says:
    November 13th, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    reminds of toothpaste…?

  15. Andrew Symons Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    No, no, no
    First mistake is Rolling out a new brand logo while original is still in existence, Absolutely the worst Logo for a bank,
    Childish very unoriginal and will date extremely quickly
    I thought it was encompassing a pigs tail but not too sure now as a pigs tail is curly,
    I very much doubt this is a rebranding exercise God forbid if it is, I wish they had called me first to steer them away from rubbish design like this
    Shame on the brand manager and the ad agency who did this.

  16. Martin Says:
    November 25th, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    Looks like it was handwritten from toothpaste. Approachable, yes. Not sure it projects a bank that an older market could trust. Maybe kids could put their piggy bank money in it!!!

  17. Kris Sowersby Says:
    November 26th, 2008 at 9:45 am

    Hi all,

    I realise I’m a bit late to the party, but I thought you might be interested in a few more opinions on the ‘rebrand’ here:

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/this_little_piggy_went_to_the_bank.php

    I’ve chipped in where appropriate, it may help to give you all a bit of perspective as well.

    I’d just like to reply to Andrew Symons directly. I’m not sure if you’ve ever undertaken a major rebrand, it’s hard to tell—I couldn’t find a portfolio site with your work. But you’d know that it is a huge, all-encompassing task to rebrand everything at once, from websites to internal livery to advertising to on-site signage. So to say that it’s a mistake to roll the new brand out while the old one is “still in existence” is rather unfair, in my opinion. Perhaps one day you’ll get the call that you desire—hopefully your work won’t be prematurely crucified before it’s fully finished.

    –K

  18. kristian not kris Says:
    November 27th, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    The gap between B & N irks me huge.. I could deal if the N & Z hadn’t been connected but that lone sliver of blue might as well be wedged under my fingernail.

  19. Keir Says:
    February 19th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Initially hostile to the new mark but have come around after being exposed to the roll-out. Kris is a legend in my opinion and is a surperb ambassador for our little kiwi type industry. Keep up the good work.

  20. Keir Says:
    February 19th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    Ooops! Sorry about the typo! Bad designer!

  21. Eric Smith Says:
    February 23rd, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    If you’ve dealt with this bank it wouldn’t make a lick of difference. Damaged goods ha ha ha.

  22. bta Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    “It’s very ‘now’” is exactly what is wrong with it to my opinion. How old is BNZ and how much longer it is going to be around? Like a grandma that is dressed as a teenager! perhaps in a couple of years the lady needs to change costume again to go with the fashion flow. This time from a micro mini skirt to a crotchless bikini! :oD

  23. Chris M Says:
    June 26th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    Myself and a few of my friends have termed it the “turd”. I applaud the people who sold this idea to BNZ, well done.

  24. Colin Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    At last the Bank of New Zealand has updated and become a ‘Store’ instead of a plain old fashioned ‘Bank’, Bank Managers will now be known as ‘Store Bosses’ tellers will now have the updated name ‘checkout operators’!

  25. F'p Says:
    March 31st, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    I closed my account with the BNZ due to this logo and the subsequent advertising.

  26. Val Scheu Says:
    April 10th, 2010 at 12:57 am

    found this linked from another blog. I’ll keep following your stuff from now, cause this was rather informative. thanks.

  27. Anon Says:
    June 25th, 2010 at 3:21 am

    NEWS FLASH: BNZ have announced to staff this week that the logo will once again be changing. Including the re-addition of the southern cross, a less rounded font, and dropping the tail off the B. Keep an eye out for this change!

  28. Newish BNZ logo brings back the stars :: StopPress :: Breaking news from New Zealand Marketing magazine Says:
    August 24th, 2010 at 2:27 am

    [...] What do you think? Read some of the opinions from graphic design boffins here. [...]

  29. Adam Errington Says:
    August 24th, 2010 at 5:14 am

    We were shocked at the first attempt by DNA design – totally inappropriate for a bank, especially BNZ.

    It was a classic case of the designers and the marketing manager not understanding the reality of branding in that business market.

    Thank god they’ve brought the proud southern cross stars back and fixed the childish “toothpaste” typography. More credible now.

  30. len cheeseman Says:
    August 24th, 2010 at 6:43 am

    Its nice to see that awful appendage removed at last and the letterforms are improved,I still think its a bit primary school for my taste but its still better than the ANZ logo.That looks like some sort of health care provider,something cervical prehaps.I’m actually curious to know what sort of drugs the banks are on.One would think at this stage of post financial meltdown the friendly tone is already way past its sell by date.Reassurance and solidity please and no corny italics feel right for the times.

  31. Jo Says:
    August 24th, 2010 at 7:51 am

    Definite improvement. Some credibility regained for the brand with this design evolution. The Southern Cross adds a visual representation of NZ without it being another barstardisation of a fern. And it’s already historically tied to the BNZ identity. Nice. Good on the BNZ marketing people listening and fixing it. Can be brave to admit you didn’t get it quite right. Logos are always politically charged.

  32. Nick Says:
    August 24th, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    I think the new new logo has completely killed the personality that the re-brand communicated. The typesetting looks exceedingly average, the typeface is un-inspiring, looks like someone has done a great job at butchering Serrano.

    Actually its so bad I don’t know why I’m wasting my time commenting about this =<

  33. Gerald Says:
    August 25th, 2010 at 1:08 am

    I don’t like the new logo with the Southern Cross at all and definitely would prefer the previous one, The newish one looks simply boring especially the lettering to me it looks simply childish and ugly, Where has the piggy tail on the letter B gone? I truly liked the previous one…and what’s this I also hear they are getting rid of the pigs…Very disappointing if you were to ask me…It’s good to hear they have bought back the Southern Cross but to my tasting I hate it.

  34. Viktor Says:
    August 25th, 2010 at 1:18 am

    It’s nice to see that they bring back the Southern Cross to the BNZ logo because it represents New Zealand, but unfortunately the lettering looks very simple and plain, I don’t like it at all, I would rather have the one without the stars then have a logo with them, but that’s banks for you thinking they will make you happy by making changes but instead they don’t make you happy at all and make it look much more terrible, the previous logo was modern and fun..this one looks simple and rather horrible.

  35. Kris Sowersby Says:
    August 31st, 2010 at 12:49 am

    “The typesetting looks exceedingly average, the typeface is un-inspiring, looks like someone has done a great job at butchering Serrano.”

    I’m not sure which version of the logo you’re talking about, but let me clarify for you. I drew the full “Bank of New Zealand” wordmark under direction from DNA. It’s an optically corrected ‘sloped Roman’ based directly on Serrano. Does that mean I’m a butcher? Is it ok with you if I can, at least, butcher my own meat? As you’re a professional designer I can only assume that your comments aren’t merely based upon on a small jpg version of the logo, that you’ve actually seen it—in use—out in ‘the wild’.

    As for the new ‘bnz’ mark, I can’t comment as I wasn’t involved with that.

  36. Gattica Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:35 am

    Reminds me of what they did to the to the auckland city council logo a while back, when someone decided that it needed to be more jazzy, so they threw in some fireworks.

    Its a shame and a step backwards. The previous re-brand was one of the best to come out of nz in the last few years.

    Even with the stars at least the logo is not as bad as the ANZs which looks like a 70s basketballer – truly awful.

  37. Nick Says:
    September 11th, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    @Kris

    I was commenting on the new BNZ mark (with the southern cross). It just doesn’t float my boat.

    Let me put the record straight, I am a big fan of Serrano and I look forward to its release(?).

    @gattica

    I agree, it was one of the best re-brands in recent memory

  38. John H Says:
    September 18th, 2010 at 2:25 am

    Better but still not great. Thankfully they have allowed “Bank of New Zealand” to be used again. Trying to kill off the name (all staff had been instructed to only call the institution “bnz” which was a terrible idea as the full name has a certain gravitas – especially to non-New Zealanders who think it to be the “country’s” bank). Good to see the “tail” go. It was once pointed out to me that when glancing at a piece of Latin script, those from an Asian or Middle-Eastern background will often naturally read it backwards as that’s how they read their own languages. Thus the former “b” becomes not a “b” with a tail, but a man with a very large bottom and a small erect penis. And what’s with this lower-case obsession? Apart from a website or email address, surely our country should always be initialised as “NZ”? Which looks better – “bnz” or “BNZ”?
    Given a choice of my bank being “young and funky” or “conservative”, I’ll take conservative any day (particularly in the current economic climate…)

Leave a Reply

our next event
March 21
2012



follow Louise on Twitter follow Louise on Twitter