by Hayden Raw

Modern brands are usually built around some form of story or mantra. Stories are great; they act as cultural anchors for potential customers to associate with. They are one of the most effective pieces of your brand strategy and without a story a lot of brands would not survive. The construct of a brand is evolving with the uptake of social media induced, two-way communication. We are seeing a lot more brand influence coming from customers. With this in mind, I want to explore whether a brand culture can be built using conversation.
Lets break down the difference between a brand story and a brand culture. I like to think of this as a one-to-many relationship. A culture is constructed from many stories. Culture is the macro state. It’s built up over time through consistent and positioned story telling.
What are the key parts to building a brand culture and how does that relate to communication? I recently spoke to Keren from Trellis Brand Strategy about whether brand culture could be built on conversation. She mentioned that brand’s inherently require a personality before they can have a conversation. I tend to agree. To exist in conversation without personality is impossible. Every communication a brand makes reflects at least the personality of the communicator. In its simplest of forms brand culture exists through the personality of the communicator. What I’m looking for is whether this personality is a heavy enough to influence ongoing culture.
For experiment sake, lets say the personality comes first. A brand communicates to its customers with a preconceived personality. Would it be possible for the brands personality to change based on customer association? Presuming this is a strategic personality; would it incur more harm than good if it were to change? That’s a question for your strategist to figure out the correct answer to.
What if communication comes first? Lets get a little hypothetical and imagine that a totally blank canvas brand was to engage in communication with customers. Obviously they would need a product offering and a target market, but lets assume their brand culture is non-existent. Would it be possible for the culture to be built by the association of the customers? Most definitely. This type of association-driven culture works through both purchasing and communication patterns.
Brand culture is a product of so many factors. The most important are product, personality, story and communication. The way they affect a business is relative to the engagement channels and methods. I believe that a brand culture can be formed by communication, but I also believe that to truly make the best use of brands resources they should have a pre-conceived personality that jump-starts the engagement.
So what do you think? Is it possible to create a brand culture based on communication? What needs to come first, the personality or the communication? Is the role of the designer to create a personality based on the visual?
December 10th, 2009 at 7:24 am
We inject a certain amount of our own personality into any brand we work on (whether we want to or not). And it is the designers job to create personality – ad that intangible value.
How are today’s “prosumers” talking back to designers?
December 10th, 2009 at 10:19 am
I agree Shaun.
Designers play an important role in the creation of the brand personality whether they choose to or not. I think this factor is very hard to quantify when scoping out a branding job as well. How do you tell a person that the reason why their quote is so high is that we need to spend time creating a personality?
In my opinion prosumers are awesome. These are people that are taking it on their own to help define the brands they want to interact with. This is an amazing resource for the brands that are proactive enough to pick up on it.
I think there is a common disparity here though in that with the use of social media as the response tool, prosumers comments are often not getting to the designer in their most pure form. This very valuable information is getting filtered by a representative of the brand and this creates a subjective lens.
How do you choose to interact with brands? Does the concept of prosumerism interest you? Thats a couple of questions for everyone.
December 11th, 2009 at 11:01 am
Whenever we develop anything we always test it, but we rarely get good feedback from our clients customers. The best thing we have seen is a bit of plagiarism! Tho our work is nearly all B2B (corporate).
December 12th, 2009 at 11:51 am
Plagiarism is the ultimate for of flattery isn’t it. Shame it usually comes from competing business.
Have you tried to integrate tools to aid your clients customers give feedback? Or were you observing passively?
December 14th, 2009 at 9:00 am
Good idea! We apply lots of new media thinking to our print work to start conversations between our clients and their customers but never with us!